<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Humanist Ethics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/</link>
	<description>Not so much about humanism anymore. Expect lefty politics and thoughts about higher education.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2012 06:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarking</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grammarking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marie, thanks very much for commenting. I&#039;ve just registered at Think Humanism and hopefully tomorrow I&#039;ll think of something post-worthy.

You&#039;re definitely right that it is a *challenge* for all humanists to make it a positive worldview. I only have to compare my posts here to Tim&#039;s over at The Friendly Humanist to see that mine are dripping in negativity. But then that&#039;s more my style, and more in line with my personality. I call a spade a spade and I don&#039;t suffer fools.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, by the way, I&#039;ve heard sniping from both the HA and the HSS. It&#039;s weird but some of it seems to be on a very personal level which is genuinely surprising for me. You&#039;d think the similarities would outweigh their differences.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marie, thanks very much for commenting. I&#8217;ve just registered at Think Humanism and hopefully tomorrow I&#8217;ll think of something post-worthy.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re definitely right that it is a *challenge* for all humanists to make it a positive worldview. I only have to compare my posts here to Tim&#8217;s over at The Friendly Humanist to see that mine are dripping in negativity. But then that&#8217;s more my style, and more in line with my personality. I call a spade a spade and I don&#8217;t suffer fools.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, by the way, I&#8217;ve heard sniping from both the HA and the HSS. It&#8217;s weird but some of it seems to be on a very personal level which is genuinely surprising for me. You&#8217;d think the similarities would outweigh their differences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maria</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Maria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 13:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for this very interesting review, which I have only just come across.

It seems to be true that many individual humanists are very preoccupied with religion. The high proportion of religion-related meetings held by HSS local groups would suggest this is as true of HSS members as it is of anyone else. Given the current climate, I don&#039;t find this particularly surprising; concern about the power and privilege of relgion and wanting to do something about it is the stimulus for many people joining humanist organisations.

But the challenge facing all of us as humanists is to develop humanism as a positive worldview for the 21st century and the constant focus on religion isn&#039;t doing much towards this objective. The HA has many distinguished &#039;Honorary Associates&#039; some of whom are contributing greatly to humanist thought. I would hope that they will be speakers at Humanist Academy events in future - or do any of the other things promised on the HA website. At present their role appears to be to lend the HA an air of credibility that it would otherwise lack. It is early days, however, and at least the HA are trying to do something. Hopefully the HA will learn from its mistakes.

By the way, I would have expected that, instead of sniping because they weren&#039;t invited to the party, the HSS would be supporting initiatives by other humanists as well as organising their own public, national events geared at developing a positive humanist philosophy. If I&#039;m not mistaken, the only public HSS debate held recently was by a local group on the existence of God!

Finally, all those interested in humanism - regardless of their personal theological stance or world view - are welcome to join in the discussions at www.thinkhumanism.com.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this very interesting review, which I have only just come across.</p>
<p>It seems to be true that many individual humanists are very preoccupied with religion. The high proportion of religion-related meetings held by HSS local groups would suggest this is as true of HSS members as it is of anyone else. Given the current climate, I don&#8217;t find this particularly surprising; concern about the power and privilege of relgion and wanting to do something about it is the stimulus for many people joining humanist organisations.</p>
<p>But the challenge facing all of us as humanists is to develop humanism as a positive worldview for the 21st century and the constant focus on religion isn&#8217;t doing much towards this objective. The HA has many distinguished &#8216;Honorary Associates&#8217; some of whom are contributing greatly to humanist thought. I would hope that they will be speakers at Humanist Academy events in future &#8211; or do any of the other things promised on the HA website. At present their role appears to be to lend the HA an air of credibility that it would otherwise lack. It is early days, however, and at least the HA are trying to do something. Hopefully the HA will learn from its mistakes.</p>
<p>By the way, I would have expected that, instead of sniping because they weren&#8217;t invited to the party, the HSS would be supporting initiatives by other humanists as well as organising their own public, national events geared at developing a positive humanist philosophy. If I&#8217;m not mistaken, the only public HSS debate held recently was by a local group on the existence of God!</p>
<p>Finally, all those interested in humanism &#8211; regardless of their personal theological stance or world view &#8211; are welcome to join in the discussions at <a href="http://www.thinkhumanism.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinkhumanism.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarking</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grammarking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 10:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I entirely agree, and I fully support the ceremonial role of the HSS, but I don&#039;t see how you can claim that it wouldn&#039;t have been a religion bash if the HSS were involved. No offence intended.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I entirely agree, and I fully support the ceremonial role of the HSS, but I don&#8217;t see how you can claim that it wouldn&#8217;t have been a religion bash if the HSS were involved. No offence intended.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald McLaren</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald McLaren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am only pointing out that those who profess a religious faith are perfectly entitled to do so.  And the &#039;only interested in making money from ceremonies&#039; is entirely misplaced.  A valuable public service accrues from the network that we provide.  Certainly we need specialist views but not those that are framed in offense.  The way forward is via inclusion and tolerance and I hope that the HA are aligned with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am only pointing out that those who profess a religious faith are perfectly entitled to do so.  And the &#8216;only interested in making money from ceremonies&#8217; is entirely misplaced.  A valuable public service accrues from the network that we provide.  Certainly we need specialist views but not those that are framed in offense.  The way forward is via inclusion and tolerance and I hope that the HA are aligned with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarking</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grammarking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, Roger is a member of the HSS and June, as mentioned, is a representative of the HA. I don&#039;t know how official that is for you, but I&#039;d rather we had specialists in different fields (environment, law, feminism, politics, science, education) rather than just a designated general humanist.

It&#039;s strange that there&#039;s such rivalry between the HA and the HSS. I&#039;ve heard it said before that the HSS are only interested in making money from ceremonies, and on the other hand that the HA don&#039;t really do anything. Surely both are looking for the same thing? It&#039;s a divisive force that can&#039;t be good for humanism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Roger is a member of the HSS and June, as mentioned, is a representative of the HA. I don&#8217;t know how official that is for you, but I&#8217;d rather we had specialists in different fields (environment, law, feminism, politics, science, education) rather than just a designated general humanist.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s strange that there&#8217;s such rivalry between the HA and the HSS. I&#8217;ve heard it said before that the HSS are only interested in making money from ceremonies, and on the other hand that the HA don&#8217;t really do anything. Surely both are looking for the same thing? It&#8217;s a divisive force that can&#8217;t be good for humanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ronald McLaren</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ronald McLaren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is of concern that none of the &#039;speakers&#039; were official representatives of the largest UK secular humanist organisations (pro-rata population).  Had the HSS been represented, there would not have been the &#039;religion bash&#039; which appears to have prevailed in part of the debates.  For that, we apologise on the basis of our well established inclusion and tolerance of those who would believe that which they do.  That is their entitlement under the law and the Humanist Society of Scotland will continue to engage with all faiths and none, for the betterment of Scotland.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is of concern that none of the &#8216;speakers&#8217; were official representatives of the largest UK secular humanist organisations (pro-rata population).  Had the HSS been represented, there would not have been the &#8216;religion bash&#8217; which appears to have prevailed in part of the debates.  For that, we apologise on the basis of our well established inclusion and tolerance of those who would believe that which they do.  That is their entitlement under the law and the Humanist Society of Scotland will continue to engage with all faiths and none, for the betterment of Scotland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarking</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grammarking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 12:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe I didn&#039;t once mention Darwin Day... wow.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I didn&#8217;t once mention Darwin Day&#8230; wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grammarking</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[grammarking]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Stuart and I do oppose faith schools, but it&#039;s not going to help the cause if we misrepresent what they&#039;re actually like. I also think there&#039;s potential for offence and heavier opposition if people start claiming that Jesus never existed. Then humanists look like they&#039;ve just got a grudge against religion or something, rather than making reasoned and rational arguments on issues like faith schools.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Stuart and I do oppose faith schools, but it&#8217;s not going to help the cause if we misrepresent what they&#8217;re actually like. I also think there&#8217;s potential for offence and heavier opposition if people start claiming that Jesus never existed. Then humanists look like they&#8217;ve just got a grudge against religion or something, rather than making reasoned and rational arguments on issues like faith schools.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Ritchie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-82</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quite apart from whether Faith Schools are brainwashing zombie-factories (my guess would be that some are and most aren&#039;t), I thought Sue England&#039;s more political point about Faith Schools being one way religions increase their level of power within society and infiltrate areas which should really be under the control of a democratic government was much more interesting (and concerning!).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite apart from whether Faith Schools are brainwashing zombie-factories (my guess would be that some are and most aren&#8217;t), I thought Sue England&#8217;s more political point about Faith Schools being one way religions increase their level of power within society and infiltrate areas which should really be under the control of a democratic government was much more interesting (and concerning!).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Mills</title>
		<link>http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/humanist-ethics/#comment-81</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tim Mills]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 15:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://notsofriendlyhumanist.wordpress.com/?p=45#comment-81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, good post.  Just a minor point - it&#039;s the 21st century, not the 20th.  I made the same mistake talking about this with someone today.

One point that Sue England made that I thought was appropriate was that giving rights to a group (such as giving some aspects of Sharia law official status in the UK for the sake of the Muslim community) doesn&#039;t necessarily mean that individuals within the group enjoy more rights, and may even mean the reverse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good post.  Just a minor point &#8211; it&#8217;s the 21st century, not the 20th.  I made the same mistake talking about this with someone today.</p>
<p>One point that Sue England made that I thought was appropriate was that giving rights to a group (such as giving some aspects of Sharia law official status in the UK for the sake of the Muslim community) doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that individuals within the group enjoy more rights, and may even mean the reverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
